Dog Chat  
April 06, 2007, 10:17: PM 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
Login with username, password and session length
News: Like our new layout? Having trouble using the board? Get in touch with us at admin@dogchat.co.uk
  
  Home  Help    Login  Register 

Note that "TODAY" is April 6, 2007.

THE "DOG CHAT ADMINISTRATOR"

YOUR "PETFRIENDLYWORLD" MOMMY

LYIN' RYAN O'MEARA - A "SENSITIVE" LITTLE "DOGGY-MOMMY" WIMP OF AN "ADMIN" WITH NO SENSE OF RESPONSIBILITY TO HER OWN RULES! 

LYIN' RYAN O'MEARA SAYS ONE THING - THEN DOES EXACTLY THE THE OPPOSITE - AND TRIES TO JUSTIFY THAT WITH SOME OF HER LYIN' RYAN O'MEARA BULLSHIT! 

I DELETED MY ACCOUNT ON HER KINDERGARTEN PLAYGROUND AFTER READING HER NURSERY SCHOOL "RULE/NO RULE" EXCUSES, SHOWN BELOW. 

Dog Chat > The DogChat.co.uk Discussion Forum > Dog Behaviour and Training Issues (Moderators: SpeedsMum, ellieangel, LisaLQ, Kerriebaby) > AN ADMINISTRATOR'S PROBLEM
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
 Print 
 AuthorTopic: AN ADMINISTRATOR'S PROBLEM  (Read 16 times)
choccielab and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Steve Leigh
New Puppy

 Offline

Breeds: German Shepherd
Dogs Names: Tzar
Posts: 34


 
 
AN ADMINISTRATOR'S PROBLEM
« on: Today at 09:56 PM »
This is my 5TH email attempt TO RESOLVE THIS PROBLEM. Below, is a verbatim paste of the email(s) sent to Ryan, "K9media admin" at 3 different email addresses.

(begin emails)


Hello Ryan,

Once again, Louie Castle has made these insane accusations of strangling and abuse.  They are contained in reply #40, under the subject "running off", located under "Dog Behaviour and Training Issues".

[This is the 5th time I've sent this with no response from anyone.]

THIS time I ask you to put an end to this, as you have stated you would, in January.  You very clearly stated that accusations of dog abuse would not be tolerated, as shown here, in your messages #1209 and #1211:

Written by Ryan O'Meara (k9media administrator) on January 11, 2007

[note: the two following quotes shown as "Today" were written on January 11, 2007]

Pages: 1 ... 79 80 [81] 82  « previous next »
  Print   
  Author Topic: Positive Vs E Collar Training  (Read 17217 times) 
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. 
k9media
Administrator
Dog Chat
Respect Points: 4
 Offline
Breeds: Labrador, Rottweiler
Dogs Names: Chloe, Mia
Posts: 493

Re: Positive Vs E Collar Training
« Reply #1209 on: Today at 04:47 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is and will be the last time I say this. Freedom to debate the use of the e-collar is permitted. Making accusations about people abusing animals IS NOT. A further breach and I'll have no option left but to ban.
 
 
Re: Positive Vs E Collar Training
« Reply #1211 on: Today at 04:50 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lou, point made an accepted. I have tried to be clear as crystal in my previous post. The next person to call another poster an animal abuser is gone. Really is as simple as that.
-------------------------------------------
On April 3, 2007, Louis Castle wrote:

I don't need videos to know that you've abused dogs on your training table stevie.  The mere fact that virtually everyone (you included) who uses that tool does so behind closed doors after building costly buildings to hide what they do from public view; is plenty of evidence of what you used to do, perhaps what you still do.  The fact that you did all of this out of the public view means that there's no video of it.  That hardly means that you didn't do it. 

Tell us stevie, why else would you only do table training behind closed doors out of the view of the public? 

More evidence of this abuse is the fact that your hero, Gene England has all but admitted that he used to strangle dogs on the training table.  Since you worship at his feet, there's no doubt that you did the same. 

It's quite possible that the real reason you won't supply references to your alleged police training is that you know that they'll tell the truth about what they saw, you strangling dogs and otherwise abusing them on the training table. 
-------------------------------------------

I guess your "rules" simply don't apply to the "special" individuals?  OR WILL YOU ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS?

Thank you very much,
Steve Leigh

(end of emails)

If it isn't asking too much, could you possibly "administrate" your forum, as stated above?  If it isn't possible, could you kindly explain why?

Thank you in advance,
Steve 

« Last Edit: Today at 09:58 PM by Steve Leigh » Logged
Pardon my sarcasm, it's a chronic attribute of my charismatic character.

Cheers!
Steve
http://www.sl-prokeys.com/wffcw/index.htm
k9media
 


 
 
Re: AN ADMINISTRATOR'S PROBLEM
« Reply #1 on: Today at 10:16 PM »
Steve,

A quick tip for you, if you raise an issue and I don't do anything about it, it might be because I don't feel it warrants it. Just because you TELL me to do it, doesn't mean I will - in fact the more you TELL me to do something the LESS likely it is that I will.

That's an interesting way to establish a rule.  So your "rules" aren't rules, is that right?

Don't forget, your very first posts on this forum were with the sole intention of attacking and ridiculing Lou - there is such a thing as a right to reply in similar terms - in simple terms, you threw the first punch in this and now you're all whiney about it.

Wrong.  A little review of what and when I wrote messages will show that I didn't mention insane Voodoo Louie until he started accusing me of strangling dogs on tables. 

In the instances of abuse accusations I dealt with earlier they related to claims against people who were not here to defend themselves. If you had approaced me in a slightly different tone, I might just have been inclined to do something.

Oh!  Now I understand .... your "rules" are affected by HOW I asked a question about your "non-rules"!

s it was you came in shouting the odds, telling me what to do in relation to a person who you seem to have a fascination with from your very first post. I've not censored any of your attacks on Lou and you have frequently called him a liar - which is a serious claim.

What do you call someone who tells insane lies about strangling dogs?  Do you call them "honest" and "truthful"?  I don't - I just call them liars.

Quite honestly, I can understand why Lou would wish to retaliate in kind. So, there you go. Take it for what it's worth but at least you got your response.

 Logged

 
Pages: [1]
 Print 
« previous next »

You really have to LAUGH at LYIN' RYAN O'MEARA'S OBVIOUS BULLSHIT

The "rules" are worthless - they aren't "rules"

 

LYIN' RYAN can take a "quick tip" from me:

shove your "tips" in exactly the same place you shove your Tampax

use your backspace to return to previous page or click for Voodoo Louie's menu